More ANWR ranting
Casting a Cold Eye on Arctic Oil
Naturally. He knows all about it after a week.
I have my Alaskan-born opinions about this. People who are not FROM there will just not get it. It takes longer than a week to shed the expectation of some touch of man being just around the corner. People from crowded areas don't get how VAST the Alaska wilderness is.
They forget how small we human beings are. Remember Jack London? "To Build a Fire"? It's just one teeny human animal against the whole forces of nature. You have to work hard to make a dent in it.
But this is what NY Time Journalist has to say about it:
My face curls back from this facile, unsophisticated answer. WHAT?! If we put a little oil drilling town in the primordial ooze (and it is oozy) of Alaska, this prevents our CHILDREN (think of the children!) from seeing the primordial ooze.
What is the point of preserving stuff, anyway? Yes, it is nice for lots of people to get to see the primordial ooze of alaska. They might begin to have a respect for nature that seems to be utterly lacking in paved-over areas. So yes, let's save it so that people can look at it.
But observation changes that which is observed, right? you have to build ROADS for people to be able to get out there to observe that primordialness.
And why not have the road be built by the oil companies, who could take advantage of the oil while they were up there?
While they were at it, they could get some money to the native alaskans who could use it. What's wrong with that?
Nature is vast up there. It will be just fine if we take a patch to drill for oil and make some roads to check it out.
Comments
People who haven't lived there for a while just don't understand, I guess. It ain't no San Gregorio beach. It's more like the back side of the moon.
Posted by: Bryan Green | September 11, 2003 12:37 PM